Real PatriotPrinciples Over Preference
HomeBrowseActorsThe RecordTrendsLearnEvaluateDiscoverConsolePipeline
Sign In

Browse Actions

Every evaluated action across the Constitutional Evaluation Engine. Filter, sort, and dive into the evidence.

These scores come from our automated constitutional evaluator.

Each score is generated by an automated evaluator that applies our published methodology, and every score links to the specific evidence behind it. Some older evaluations were imported from our previous systemA portion of evaluations were carried over from the scoring system we used before the current automated evaluator. These keep a lower confidence label until the evaluator reviews them directly. and carry lower confidence by design. Individual row banners add more detail on a per-evaluation basis. How we calculate this.

····
Type
Branch
SeverityActions that scored a severe conflict with founding principles AND carry major impact — see the methodology page for the exact threshold.StatusSigned into law or took effect.Introduced but not enacted into law.
Issue
Score legend: +1 moves toward a principle · 0A score of 0 is honest: sometimes an action has effects that balance across this principle (e.g., expands and limits liberty in different ways), and sometimes we genuinely don't have clear evidence yet. Hover any card's score badge for the evaluator's specific reasoning. means the action is balanced across this principle, OR we found no clear evidence either way — hover for detail · −1 moves away from a principle.|Confidence legend: high (strong evidence) · medium (some evidence) · low (limited evidence — interpret with caution). Learn how we score →

§6 Minority Protection now evaluated on all 991 actions (v=3.1)

Recently Evaluated

No evaluated actions yet in this class.

Latest Bills

No evaluated actions yet in this class.

Latest Executive Orders

Recent executive directives, ranked by signing date.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightAug 3, 2026
Establishing the President's Military Spouse Commission

Establishing the President's Military Spouse Commission

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Confirms Existing Practice — Reinforces the status quo without changing structure. Small structural effect.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Aug 7, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJul 24, 2026
Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution

Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution

Farther from the principles

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
−0.17
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.−1−1: This action moves away from this constitutional principle — it weakens or undermines it.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine. Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (83% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 29, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJul 20, 2026
Securing America's Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials

Securing America's Defense Supply Chains and Ensuring Domestic Acquisition of Critical Materials

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Hard to Reverse — The action is more difficult to undo than the type of instrument normally suggests. The next administration would face more friction rescinding it than was needed to issue it.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 24, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 25, 2026
Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience

Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 14, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 22, 2026
Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation

Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 14, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Executive OrderExecutive Order: directive issued by the President to the federal government.ExecutiveExecutive Branch: issued by the President or executive agencies.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 22, 2026
Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks

Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Unelected Primary Author — The main author isn’t elected by voters. Agency heads and executive-branch lawyers can shape policy without facing the ballot.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 14, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Latest Court Rulings

Recent federal court rulings, ranked by decision date.

All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 30, 2026
Jones v. United States

Jones v. United States

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Rushed Process — Passed unusually quickly, via voice vote despite substantive content, or without notice-and-comment when normally required.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 30, 2026
Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26

Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 30, 2026
Trump v. Barbara

Trump v. Barbara

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 30, 2026
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n

Closer to the principles

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
+0.17
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.+1+1: This action moves toward this constitutional principle — it strengthens or upholds it.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 30, 2026
West Virginia v. B. P. J.

West Virginia v. B. P. J.

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score22 concerns flagged: Named Entity Targeting — The action applies a legal burden to a specific named group rather than a general rule that works the same way for everyone. Closest historical analog: the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →
All 5 constitutional principles have been scored for this action.Supreme Court RulingSupreme Court Ruling: decision by the highest court of the United States.JudicialJudicial Branch: ruled on by a court.CORECORE: This action is a direct constitutional act — it directly creates or changes government power.Major impact weightJun 29, 2026
Trump v. Slaughter

Trump v. Slaughter

Mixed signal

Civic palette (colorblind-safe)Traffic-light palette
Compare toNo score distribution available for this action type yet.Not tagged with a policy issue — much government activity (procedure, appointments, administration) falls outside the issue taxonomy.
0.00
−1 farther0+1 closer
PrincipleScoreSourcesFlags
LibertyLiberty: protects individual rights and freedoms from government overreach.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Equality Before the LawEquality: ensures all people are treated fairly under the law regardless of identity.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
ConsentConsent: government must act with the knowledge and agreement of the governed.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Limited & Divided PowerLimited & Divided Power: no single branch or person should hold unchecked government power.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Rule of LawRule of Law: everyone — including the government — must follow the law.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Minority ProtectionMinority Protection: protects individuals and groups from majoritarian faction and mob rule.00: This action is either balanced across this principle, or we found no clear evidence either way.11 source citations supporting this score11 concern flagged: Creates Major Structural Change — This changes the legal landscape — creates a new regime, overturns precedent, or establishes new doctrine.
Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
Most of this evaluation rests on thin evidence (100% low-confidence). Interpret with caution.
Methodology v=3.2.0 · Scored Jul 19, 2026 · 6 total citationsHow was this scored? →

Evaluate Your Own Content

Submit any legislation, executive order, or policy proposal for non-partisan constitutional evaluation against the five co-equal constitutional principles.

Start Evaluation
About this page

System Health

Actions evaluated12,713
Non-low confidence1,300
Actions with at least one high or medium confidence principle.
Methodology3.2.0
Last refreshAug 13, 2026, 11:38 AM

Principle Spotlight

  • Liberty845
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Equality Before the Law838
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Consent834
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Limited & Divided Power833
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Rule of Law829
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.

Based on all evaluations

Quick Links

  • How we score
  • Our 6 principles
  • The Record
  • Compare
  • Test yourself

System Health

Actions evaluated12,713
Non-low confidence1,300
Actions with at least one high or medium confidence principle.
Methodology3.2.0
Last refreshAug 13, 2026, 11:38 AM

Principle Spotlight

  • Liberty845
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Equality Before the Law838
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Consent834
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Limited & Divided Power833
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.
  • Rule of Law829
    Confidence mix: dark = high confidence, grey = medium, light = low. More dark means stronger evidence.

Based on all evaluations

Quick Links

  • How we score
  • Our 6 principles
  • The Record
  • Compare
  • Test yourself
The Six Principles·How It Works·Who Scores

Real Patriot — Principles Over Preference

We apply the same standard to everyone.